Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia Research Articles

A Single Nucleotide Variant in Ankyrin-2 Influencing Ventricular Tachycardia in COVID-19 Associated Myocarditis

Introduction: This paper explores the potential influence of a single nucleotide variant in the ANK-2 gene on COVID-19 myocarditis-related ventricular tachycardia. Case Description: A 53-year-old female with a history of Crohn’s disease and asthma developed COVID-19. Shortly after infection, she experienced symptoms of chest pressure, palpitations, and shortness of breath, leading to the eventual diagnosis of myocarditis complicated by recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Treatment with mechanistically driven anti-arrhythmic therapy and beta-blockers suppressed this highly symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Genetic testing to further risk stratify and influence long term care identified a single nucleotide variant in the ANK-2 gene, which is known to be associated with arrhythmic risk. Discussion: This case study highlights the use of rationally selected anti-arrhythmic therapy, mexiletine, in the management of ventricular tachycardia associated with COVID-19 myocarditis and the presence of a single nucleotide variant in ANK-2, raising the possibility of its contribution to VT susceptibility and severity. Our patient demonstrated significant improvement with administered therapeutics, including the resolution of myocarditis and ventricular tachycardia. The normalization of the QT interval during the resolution phase further supports the potential influence of the genetic variant in ANK-2 on potassium channel activity.

Exploring the Full Potential of Radiofrequency Technology: A Practical Guide to Advanced Radiofrequency Ablation for Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is an established strategy to prevent ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence and ICD shocks. Yet delivery of durable lesion sets by means of traditional unipolar radiofrequency ablation remains challenging, and left ventricular transmurality is rarely achieved. Failure to ablate and eliminate functionally relevant areas is particularly common in deep intramyocardial substrates, e.g. septal VT and cardiomyopathies. Here, we aim to give a practical-orientated overview of advanced and emerging RF ablation technologies to target these complex VT substrates. We summarize recent evidence in support of these technologies and share experiences from a tertiary VT centre to highlight important "hands-on" considerations for operators new to advanced RF ablation strategies. A number of innovative and modified radiofrequency ablation approaches have been proposed to increase energy delivery to the myocardium and maximize RF lesion dimensions and depth. These include measures of impedance modulation, combinations of simultaneous unipolar ablations or true bipolar ablation, intramyocardial RF delivery via wires or extendable RF needles and investigational linear or spherical catheter designs. Recent new clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of these investigational technologies and strategies merits a re-evaluation of their role and clinic application for percutaneous VT ablations. Complexity of substrates targeted with percutaneous VT ablation is increasing and requires detailed preprocedural imaging to characterize the substrate to inform the procedural approach and selection of ablation technology. Depending on local experience, options for additional and/or complementary interventional treatments should be considered upfront in challenging substrates to improve the success rates of index procedures. Advanced RF technologies available for clinical VT ablations include impedance modulation via hypotonic irrigation or additional dispersive patches and simultaneous unipolar as well as true bipolar ablation. Promising investigational RF technologies involve an extendable needle RF catheter, intramyocardial RF delivery over intentionally perforated wires as well as a variety of innovative ablation catheter designs including multipolar linear, spherical and partially insulated ablation catheters.

Lipomatous Metaplasia Is Associated With Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence Following Ablation in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence rates remain high following ablation among patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). This study sought to define the prevalence of lipomatous metaplasia (LM) in patients with NICM and VT and its association with postablation VT recurrence. From patients who had ablation of left ventricular VT, we retrospectively identified 113 consecutive NICM patients with preprocedural contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CECT), from which LM was segmented. Nested within this cohort were 62 patients that prospectively underwent CECT and cardiac magnetic resonance from which myocardial border zone and dense late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were segmented. A control arm of 30 NICM patients without VT with CECT was identified. LM was identified among 57% of control patients without VT vs 83% of patients without VT recurrence and 100% of patients with VT recurrence following ablation. In multivariable analyses, LM extent was the only independent predictor of VT recurrence, with an adjusted HR per 1-g LM increase of 1.1 (P< 0.001). Patients with LM extent≥2.5g had 4.9-fold higher hazard of VT recurrence than those with LM<2.5g (P< 0.001). In the nested cohort with 32 VT recurrences, LM extent was independently associated with VT recurrence after adjustment for border zone and LGE extent (HR per 1g increase: 1.1; P = 0.036). Myocardial LM is prevalent in patients with NICM of a variety of etiologies, and its extent is associated with postablation VT recurrence independent of the degree of fibrosis.

Efficacy of Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients without an ICD Implantation

BackgroundImplantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) prevents sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Catheter ablation has been shown to effectively reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence, yet its efficacy in patients without an ICD implantation remains uncertain. ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the outcomes of ablation for VT in ICM patients without a backup ICD. MethodsICM patients received ablation for VT without an ICD implantation were included in this study. Ablation was guided by either activation mapping or substrate mapping. Endocardial ablation was the primary strategy; epicardial access was considered when endocardial ablation failed. The primary endpoint was VT recurrence during follow-up, with secondary endpoints including cardiovascular rehospitalization, all-cause mortality, and a composite of these events. ResultsA total of 114 patients were included, with the mean age of 58.2 ± 11.1 years, 102 of whom (89.5%) were male.Twelve patients (10.5%) underwent endo-epicardial ablation, while the rest received endocardial ablation. With a median follow-up of 53.8 months (24.8-84.2), VT recurred in 45 patients (39.5%), and 6 patients (5.3%) died, including 2 SCD cases. The recurrence rate of VT was significantly lower in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation compared to those with endocardial ablation only (8.3% vs 43.1%, Log-rank P = 0.032). After multivariate adjustment, epicardial ablation remained associated with a reduced risk of VT recurrence (hazard ratio: 0.14, 95% confidential interval: 0.02-0.98, P = 0.048). ConclusionICM patients undergoing VT ablation without a backup ICD experienced a notably low rate of arrhythmic death, with most recurrences proving non-lethal.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Suppression of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The VANISH2 Trial

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with prior myocardial infarction is associated with adverse quality of life and clinical outcomes, despite the presence of implanted defibrillators (ICDs). Suppression of recurrent VT can be accomplished with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. The Ventricular Tachycardia Antiarrhythmics or Ablation In Structural Heart Disease 2 (VANISH2) trial is designed to determine whether ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT.The VANISH2 trial enrolls patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT (with one of: ≥1 ICD shock; ≥3 episodes treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and symptoms; ≥5 episodes treated with ATP regardless of symptoms; ≥3 episodes within 24 hours; or sustained VT treated with electrical cardioversion or pharmacologic conversion). Enrolled patients are classified as either sotalol-eligible, or amiodarone-eligible, and then are randomized to either catheter ablation or to that antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with randomization stratified by drug-eligibility group. Drug therapy, catheter ablation procedures and ICD programming are standardized.All patients will be followed until two years after randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of mortality at any time, appropriate ICD shock after 14 days, VT storm after 14 days, and treated sustained VT below detection of the ICD after 14 days. The outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle using survival analysis techniques.The results of the VANISH2 trial are intended to provide data to support clinical decisions on how to suppress VT for patients with prior myocardial infarction.Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02830360

Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity-score matched analysis

Introduction and objectivesCatheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity-score matched population of ICM or NICM patients. MethodsSingle-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality. ResultsThe PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3–3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank p=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank p=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32–4.14], p=0.004), NYHA class III/IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11–4.04], p=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25–3.96], p=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence. ConclusionNon-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients were at increased risk of VT recurrence after ablation, although long-term mortality did not differ.

Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: Risk Stratification and Guiding Antiarrhythmic Therapies.

Electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has been utilized to induce ventricular tachycardia (VT), thereby improving risk stratification for patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and determining the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapies, especially catheter ablation. A variety of procedural aspects can be modified during PVS in order to alter the sensitivity and specificity of the test including the addition of multiple baseline pacing cycle lengths, extrastimuli, and pacing locations. The definition of a positive result is also critically important, which has varied from exclusively sustained monomorphic VT (>30 seconds) to any ventricular arrhythmia regardless of morphology. In this review, we discuss the history of PVS and evaluate its role in sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a variety of patient populations. We propose an approach to future investigations that will capitalize on the unique ability to vary the sensitivity and specificity of this test. We then discuss the application of PVS during and following catheter ablation. The strategies that have been utilized to improve the efficacy of intraprocedural PVS are highlighted during a discussion of the limitations of this probabilistic strategy. The role of noninvasive programmed stimulation is also reviewed in predicting recurrent VT and informing management decisions including repeat ablations, modifications in antiarrhythmic drugs, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. Based on the available evidence and guidelines, we propose an approach to future investigations that will allow clinicians to optimize the use of PVS for risk stratification and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Intramural needle ablation or repeated standard ablation in patients referred for repeat ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

When ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurs after standard RF ablation (sRFA) some patients benefit from repeat sRFA, whereas others warrant advanced methods such as intramural needle ablation (INA). Our objectives are to assess the utility of repeat sRFA and to clarify the benefit of INA when repeat sRFA fails in patients with VT due to structural heart disease. In consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled in a study for INA for recurrent sustained monomorphic VT despite sRFA, repeat sRFA was considered first. INA was performed during the same procedure if repeat sRFA failed or no targets for sRFA were identified. Of 85 patients enrolled, acute success with repeat sRFA was achieved in 30 patients (35%), and during the 6-month follow-up, 87% (20/23) were free of VT hospitalization, 78% were free of any VT, and 7 were lost to follow-up. INA was performed in 55 patients (65%) after sRFA failed, or no endocardial targets were found abolished or modified inducible VT in 35/55 patients (64%). During follow-up, 72% (39/54) were free of VT hospitalization, 41% were free of any VT, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Overall, 59 out of 77 (77%) patients were free of hospitalization and 52% were free of any VT. Septal-origin VTs were more likely to need INA, whereas RV and papillary muscle VTs were less likely to require INA. Repeat sRFA was beneficial in 23% (18/77) of patients with recurrent sustained VT who were referred for INA. The availability of INA increased favorable outcomes to 52%.

Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems in the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Contemporary Overview.

Ventricular tachycardias (VTs) and electrical storms (ES) are life-threatening conditions mostly seen in the setting of structural heart disease (SHD). Traditional management strategies, predominantly centered around pharmacological interventions with antiarrhythmic drugs, have demonstrated limited efficacy in these cases, whereas catheter ablation is related with more favorable outcomes. However, patients with hemodynamically unstable, recurrent VT or ES may present cardiogenic shock (CS) that precludes the procedure, and catheter ablation in patients with SHD portends a multifactorial intrinsic risk of acute hemodynamic decompensation (AHD), that is associated with increased mortality. In this setting, the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems allow the maintenance of end-organ perfusion and cardiac output, improving coronary flow and myocardial mechanics, and minimizing the effect of cardiac stunning after multiple VT inductions or cardioversion. Although ablation success and VT recurrence are not influenced by hemodynamic support devices, MCS promotes diuresis and reduces the incidence of post-procedural kidney injury. In addition, MCS has a role in post-procedural mortality reduction at long-term follow-up. The current review aims to provide a deep overview of the rationale and modality of MCS in patients with refractory arrhythmias and/or undergoing VT catheter ablation, underlining the importance of patient selection and timing for MCS and summarizing reported clinical experiences in this field.

Early Onset Severe Aortic Stenosis Presenting with Recurrent Ventricular and Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Postoperative Stroke in a 44-year-old Man with Uncontrolled Rheumatoid Arthritis

Calcific aortic stenosis is the most common aetiology of aortic stenosis and is mostly seen in older people. Systemic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are rarely associated with aortic stenosis in the literature. Uncontrolled systemic inflammation related to RA may lead to postoperative complications but this is not well documented. The patient in this case report was a 44-year-old man who had been diagnosed with RA that had been poorly controlled. He had a 7-month history of heart failure symptoms attributed to severe calcific aortic stenosis. He underwent surgical aortic valve replacement, but developed an acute cerebrovascular infarct 2 hours after surgery and recurrent unstable ventricular tachycardia on the first postoperative day warranting 15 synchronised cardioversions. RA is a rare antecedent cause of severe calcific aortic stenosis especially in younger people. Such a valvular complication associated with acute ischaemic stroke and ventricular arrhythmia warrants further study to provide optimal medical management, especially for patients with RA and early cardiovascular complications.

[Short history of the DC-Catheter-Ablation].

Direct current (DC) catheter ablation in 5patients aiming to interrupt rapid atrioventricular (AV) conduction with atrial fibrillation and subsequent pacemaker implantation was first published by M.M.Scheinman etal. (San Francisco, CA, USA) in 1982. In Germany, L.Seipel, G.Breithardt, and M.Borggrefe reported their first experience with DC catheter ablation in 1984, followed by the group in Bonn (M.Manz and B.Lüderitz) in 1985. The first international DC catheter ablation registry, which also included four German centers, reported DC catheter ablation results of 127 patients in 24centers in 1984. Complete AV block was achieved in 71% patients. In 1992, the Hannover group (H‑J.Trappe, H.Klein and J.Huang) reported results of DC catheter ablation of AV conduction performed between 1983 and 1990 in 100 patients (86% with rapid atrial fibrillation, 14% with AV-node reentry tachycardias). The first successful DC catheter ablation in apatient with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome was reported in 1985 by F.Morady etal. (San Francisco, CA, USA). In 1987, M.Borggrefe etal. were the first to report aswitch from DC catheter ablation to ahigh-frequency (HF) catheter ablation procedure in apatient with WPW syndrome. The use of DC catheter ablation to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) was described by G.O.Hartzler (Kansas City, MO, USA) in 3patients in 1983. M.Borggrefe etal. (1989) reported on 24patients who underwent DC catheter ablation for VT. Of those, 17patients did not have VT recurrence within the following 14months. In 1994, the Hannover group (H-JTrappe, H.Klein) published their 5‑year long-term results of DC catheter ablation of VT in 51patients. VT recurrence occurred in 57% patients and overall mortality was also high (16%). Acomparison of DC catheter ablation with HF catheter ablation for recurrent VT was reported in 1994 by G.Gonska etal. (Göttingen, Germany). After 2years follow-up, success rates were not found to be significantly different.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and biventricular involvement.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) improves VT-free survival in 'classic' arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). This study aims to investigate electrophysiological features and ablation outcomes in patients with ARVC and biventricular (BiV) involvement. We assembled a retrospective cohort of definite ARVC cases with sustained VTs. Patients were divided into the BiV (BiV involvement) group and the right ventricular (RV) (isolated RV involvement) group based on the left ventricular systolic function detected by cardiac magnetic resonance. All patients underwent electrophysiological mapping and VT ablation. Acute complete success was non-inducibility of any sustained VT, and the primary endpoint was VT recurrence. Ninety-eight patients (36 ± 14 years; 87% male) were enrolled, including 50 in the BiV group and 48 in the RV group. Biventricular involvement was associated with faster clinical VTs, a higher VT inducibility, and more extensive arrhythmogenic substrates (all P < 0.05). Left-sided VTs were observed in 20% of the BiV group cases and correlated with significantly reduced left ventricular systolic function. Catheter ablation achieved similar acute efficacy between these two groups, whereas the presence of left-sided VTs increased acute ablation failure (40 vs. 5%, P = 0.012). Over 51 ± 34 months [median, 48 (22-83) months] of follow-up, cumulative VT-free survival was 52% in the BiV group and 58% in the RV group (P = 0.353). A multivariate analysis showed that younger age, lower RV ejection fraction (RVEF), and non-acute complete ablation success were associated with VT recurrence in the BiV group. Biventricular involvement implied a worse arrhythmic phenotype and increased the risk of left-sided VTs, while catheter ablation maintained its efficacy for VT control in this population. Younger age, lower RVEF, and non-acute complete success predicted VT recurrence after ablation.

[History of surgical treatment of cardiac arrhythmias in Germany : Surgical treatment of ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia, especially pre-excitation syndromes (WPW)].

The history of surgical treatment of ventricular tachycardias (VT) is short, lasting from 1978 until 1993. "Indirect procedures" with infarct scar resection were performed without electrophysiologic studies, whereas "direct procedures" consisted of either complete endocardial incisions ("encircling endocardial ventriculotomy") or large endocardial resections ("endocardial peel-off" technique) after precise epicardial and endocardial mapping procedures. In Germany, the first to report on intra-operative electrophysiologic mapping for VT treatment were Ostermeyer, Breithardt and Seipel in 1979. In 1981, the Hannover group (Frank, Klein) published their first results of surgical treatment of VT. In 1984, Ostermeyer et al. demonstrated that apartial endocardial incision resulted in more beneficial results with less myocardial damage (8% versus 46%) than applying acomplete encircling incision. In 1987, the Düsseldorf group reported treatment results of 93patients. After 5years, 77% had no VT recurrence, while total mortality after 1year was 11% and after 5years 30%. In 1992, the Hannover group reported results of 147patients after endocardial resection for VT. Total mortality after 3years was 27%; recurrence of VT events occurred in 18% of the surviving cohort.The history of surgical procedures for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), in particular Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, is even shorter than that of surgery for VT. As early as 1969, Sealy, Gallagher and Cox reported the first cases of surgical intervention for WPW syndrome via endocardial access in cardioplegic arrest. In 1984, Guiraudon and Klein reported on anew procedure with epicardial access to the accessory bundle without cardioplegia in laterally localised conduction pathways. In Germany, too, the groups in Düsseldorf (Ostermeyer, Seipel, Breithardt, Borggrefe) from 1980 and the Hannover group (Frank, Klein and Kallfelz) from 1981 performed surgical procedures for WPW syndrome. In 1987, Borggrefe reported on 18patients with WPW syndrome and atrial fibrillation who had undergone surgery. After 2years, 14 of 18patients had no recurrences of tachycardia; in 1989, Frank, Klein and Kallfelz (Hannover) reported on 10children (2-14 years) operated on using the cryoablation technique. Between 1984 and 1992, atotal of 120 patients with SVT, mostly WPW syndrome, were operated on in Hannover; after 42months, 12patients had a recurrence of SVT. Two patients died during the reoperation.

MSA-VT Score for Assessment of Long-Term Prognosis after Electrical Storm Ablation.

Prognosis after electrical storm (ES) ablation remains severe, especially in patients with recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) or progressive heart failure (HF). However, single-factor-based prediction is suboptimal and may be refined by more complex algorithms. We sought to evaluate if a novel score MSA-VT (M = moderate/severe mitral regurgitation, S = severe HF at admission, A = atrial fibrillation at admission, VT = inducible SMVT after ablation) may improve prediction of death and recurrences compared to single factors and previous scores (PAINESD, RIVA and I-VT). A total of 101 consecutive ES ablation patients were retrospectively analyzed over a 32.8-month (IQR 10-68) interval. The MSA-VT score was calculated as the sum of the previously mentioned factors' coefficients based on hazard ratio values in Cox regression analysis. The AUC for death prediction by MSA-VT was 0.84 (p < 0.001), superior to PAINESD (AUC 0.63, p = 0.03), RIVA (AUC 0.69, p = 0.02) and I-VT (0.56, p = 0.3). MSA-VT ≥ 3 was associated with significantly higher mortality during follow-up (52.7%, p < 0.001). Prediction by single factors and previously published scores after ES ablation may be improved by the novel MSA-VT score; however, this requires further external validation in larger samples.

Epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation: safety and efficacy of access and ablation using low-iodine content.

Epicardial ablation has become an integral part of the treatment of ventricular tachycardias (VT). This study reports the safety of epicardial access as well as the efficacy of epicardial ablation of structural heart disease in a tertiary single-center experience. Between January 2016 and February 2022, consecutive patients undergoing an epicardial access for VT ablation were included. Different puncture techniques and occurrence of epicardial access-related complications as well as the safety of ablation using non-ionic 5% dextrose in water (D5W) compared to standard 0.9% normal saline (NS) irrigation were analyzed. VT recurrence rates during a mean follow-up of 37 ± 23months were reported. In total, 197 patients undergoing a total of 239 procedures were included (59.8 ± 15.3years, 86% males). A total of 154 patients (78%) had non-ischemic cardiomyopathies with a mean LVEF of 37 ± 14. Anterior-oriented epicardial access was aimed for in all cases and was successful in 217 (91%) of all procedures, whereas access was achieved in 19 procedures (8%) only using an inferior oriented access and in three procedures (1%) using surgical access due to severe adhesions or anatomical requirements. Overall epicardial puncture-related complications occurred in 18 (8%) of all procedures with minor pericardial bleeding in nine, pericardial tamponade in one, pneumothorax in five, pneumopericardium in one, and abdominal puncture in two cases. Presence of adhesions could be identified as the only independent predictor of epicardial access-related complications. D5W was used in 79 cases and regular 0.9% saline in 117 procedures. No differences were seen regarding acute ablation success or complications. During follow-up, 47% of all patients were free from any VTs (56% D5W vs. 40% NS; log-rank p = 0.747) and 92% of clinical VTs (98% D5W vs. 91% NS; log-rank p = 0.139). In this large single-centre experience, epicardial access and ablation were safe and feasible. Although long-term clinical VT recurrence rates were low, overall VT recurrences as well as mortality were high advocating for a highly experienced, interdisciplinary approach including intense management of underlying cardiac disease/heart failure. Routine usage of D5W was safe and associated with comparable short- or long-term clinical or overall VT freedom.

Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy as a Cause of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia Requiring Heart Transplant

Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy as a Cause of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia Requiring Heart Transplant

Clinical and Laboratory Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes after Catheter Ablation for a Ventricular Electrical Storm.

Ventricular electrical storm (VES) is characterized by the occurrence of multiple episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) over a short period of time. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been reported as an effective treatment in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). The aim of the present study was to indicate the short-term and long-term predictors of recurrent VA after RFA was performed due to VES. A retrospective, single-centre study included patients, who had undergone RFA due to VT between 2012 and 2021. In terms of the short-term (at the end of RFA) effectiveness of RFA, the following scenarios were distinguished: complete success: inability to induce any VT; partial success: absence of clinical VT; failure: inducible clinical VT. In terms of the long-term (12 months) effectiveness of RFA, the following scenarios were distinguished: effective ablation: no recurrence of any VT; partially successful ablation: VT recurrence; ineffective ablation: VES recurrence. The study included 62 patients. Complete short-term RFA success was obtained in 77.4% of patients. The estimated cumulative VT-free survival and VES-free survival were, respectively, 28% and 33% at the 12-month follow-up. Ischemic cardiomyopathy and complete short-term RFA success were predictors of long-term RFA efficacy. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were associated with VES recurrence. NLR ≥2.95 predicted VT and/or VES recurrence with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 72.2%. Ischemic cardiomyopathy and short-term complete success of RFA were predictors of no VES recurrence during the 12-month follow-up, while NLR and GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were associated with VES relapse.

Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardias: The Czech Experience

BackgroundStereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) has been proposed recently in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of STAR in the Czech Republic. MethodsVT patients were recruited in 2 expert centers after at least 1 previously failed catheter ablation (CA). A precise strategy of target volume determination and CA was used in 17 patients treated from December 2018 until June 2022 (EFFICACY cohort). This group, together with an earlier series of 19 patients with less-defined treatment strategies, composed the SAFETY cohort (n = 36). A dose of 25 Gy was delivered. ResultsIn the EFFICACY cohort, the burden of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies decreased, and this drop reached significance for direct current shocks (1.9 ± 3.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 per month; P = 0.03). Eight patients (47%) underwent repeated CA for recurrences of VT during 13.7 ± 11.6 months. In the SAFETY cohort (32 procedures, follow-up >6 months), 8 patients (25%) presented with a progression of mitral valve regurgitation, and 3 (9%) required intervention (median follow-up of 33.5 months). Two cases of esophagitis (6%) were seen with 1 death caused by the esophago-pericardial fistula (3%). A total of 18 patients (50%) died during the median follow-up of 26.9 months. ConclusionsAlthough STAR may not be very effective in preventing VT recurrences after failed CA in an expert center, it can still modify the arrhythmogenic substrate, and when used with additional CA, reduce the number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Potentially serious sides effects require close follow-up.

Management of ventricular tachycardias: insights on centre settings, procedural workflow, endpoints, and implementation of guidelines-results from an EHRA survey.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT), and its occurrence, is still one of the main reasons for sudden cardiac death and, therefore, for increased mortality and morbidity foremost in patients with structural heart [Kahle A-K, Jungen C, Alken F-A, Scherschel K, Willems S, Pürerfellner H et al. Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium. Europace 2022;24:538-51]. Catheter ablation has become a safe and effective treatment option in patients with recurrent VT [Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2020;17:e2-154]. Previous and current guidelines provide guidance on indication for VT ablation and risk assessment and evaluation of underlying disease. However, no uniform recommendation is provided regarding procedural strategies, timing of ablation, and centre setting. Therefore, these specifics seem to differ largely, and recent data are sparse. This physician-based European Heart Rhythm Association survey aims to deliver insights on not only infrastructural settings but also procedural specifics, applied technologies, ablation strategies, and procedural endpoints. Therefore, these findings might deliver a real-world scenario of VT management and potentially are of guidance for other centres.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy

BackgroundDesmoplakin (DSP) pathogenic variants are rare causes of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and often involve the right and left ventricles. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablations may be required in these patients, but procedural characteristics have not been reported. ObjectivesIn this study, the authors sought to report a multicenter experience of VT ablation in patients with DSP pathogenic variants. MethodsVT ablations performed in patients with known DSP pathogenic variants were analyzed across 6 centers in 3 countries. Patient characteristics and acute and long-term procedural outcomes were reported. ResultsA total of 20 patients (13 men, median age 43 years [Q1-Q3: 41.5-53.0 years], left ventricular ejection fraction 43.0% [Q1-Q3: 41.5%-53.0%], 11 previous failed ablations) were referred for VT ablation procedures. All patients had symptomatic VTs, with ICD therapy in 19 patients. Epicardial procedures were performed in 16 of the 20 patients. VT target sites were located in the right ventricular (RV) endocardium (n = 11), the RV epicardium (n = 4), the left ventricular (LV) endocardium (n = 2) and the LV epicardium (n = 7). In 3 patients, the VT target sites were in close proximity to coronary arteries, limiting ablation. During follow-up, VTs recurred in 11 patients, and repeated ablations were performed in 9 patients. Allowing for multiple procedures, 19 of the 20 patients remained free of VT recurrence after a median follow-up of 18 months [Q1-Q3: 5-60 months]. ConclusionsPatients with DSP cardiomyopathy often have biventricular involvement, and ablation procedures often require ablation in both ventricles and the epicardium. Recurrences are not uncommon, and the pathologic substrate can be located in close proximity to epicardial coronary arteries, limiting the success rate of ablations.